20 January 2009

Good try but no cigar

According to the New York Times blog:

Wild Oaths | 1:51 p.m. For those who remain really upset about Barack Obama’s election, here is a new argument contesting his legitimacy, courtesy of Fox News Channel. Noting that Chief Justice John Roberts flubbed his recitation of the oath of office during the swearing-in ceremony, Chris Wallace, the Fox News anchor, said: “I’m not sure that Barack Obama really is the President of the United States. Because the oath of office is set in the Constitution, and I wasn’t at all convinced that even after he tried to amend it that John Roberts ever got it out straight and that Barack Obama ever said the prescribed words. I suspect that everybody is going to forgive him and allow him to take over as president but I’m not sure he actually said what is in the Constitution.”

Brit Hume, the Fox News senior political analyst, came to Mr. Obama’s defense. “If it ever got to the Supreme Court, you have to know there would be at least one vote in favor of letting it stand,” Mr. Hume said — specifically, the vote of Chief Justice Roberts.

2 comments:

Padre Mickey said...

These people are idiots. The constitution doesn't say anything about correct recitation of the oath of office, it only says that the person who won the election becomes president at noon on the day of the inauguration.

He doesn't even have to take the oath of office to be president.

Well, we know where those wankers will be going for the next few weeks.

Kirstin said...

grrrr.